Desert Ashes for PlayStation VITA is a turn-based strategy game that attempts to capture the essence of classic retro gaming. While it does offer some unique features and aspects reminiscent of vintage titles, it falls short in certain areas, earning a rating of 3.5 out of 10.
One of the standout features of Desert Ashes is its online multiplayer mode, allowing players to engage in strategic battles against opponents from around the world. Additionally, the game offers single player campaigns that permit players to experience playing as both the winged crusade and the landians, providing a diverse gameplay experience.
The inclusion of a day-night system adds an interesting dynamic to turn-based battles, introducing weather conditions that can impact the battlefield map. For instance, bodies of water can freeze over at night, altering the strategic possibilities for players.
Furthermore, Desert Ashes provides players with unlockable perks to customize their armies, adding a layer of strategy and personalization. Perks such as the Fort Toughness Perk, which increases defense for all allied units at a structure, or the Vampire Perk, which allows players to convert attack damage to HP during specific hours of the night, enhance the gameplay experience and provide additional strategic options.
However, despite these commendable features, Desert Ashes falls short in execution. The game lacks polish and refinement, hindering the overall experience. The graphics are lackluster and fail to evoke the nostalgia typically associated with retro gaming. Additionally, the controls can feel clunky and unresponsive, detracting from the strategic nature of the gameplay.
In conclusion, Desert Ashes for PlayStation VITA attempts to capture the spirit of classic retro gaming with its turn-based strategy gameplay and unique features. While it offers some enjoyable aspects, such as online multiplayer and customizable perks, the game ultimately fails to deliver a truly memorable experience. Retro gaming enthusiasts may find elements to appreciate, but the overall execution leaves much to be desired, resulting in a rating of 3.5 out of 10.